About a year and a half ago, I started writing a post with the above title. I didn't write anything after the title. Apparently, the answer was, "No."
Who reads blogs anymore? I used to spend a couple of hours on each post, and then I thought, "Why not just post a status update on Facebook?" I did that until over a year ago, when I deleted my Facebook accounts. I don't tweet (well, once or twice every five years.) whatsapp is for family; I don't know how snapchat and instagram work.
The real reasons that I stopped posting: a) I said almost all I had to say several times; b) the situation had become even more bleak since then for Palestine; c) the world got politically worse; d) it's not about me, and who cares what I think?
Still if I add to my guilt the guilt of not writing anything, then I feel worse and worse. So here's a quick update of my thinking:
1. Zionism, as a movement to create a Jewish nation state, in the way it was created, cannot be morally justified. No people has a right to life, liberty, and self-determination at the expense of another people's right to life, liberty, and self-determination, especially when the latter people constituted the majority of the territory claimed by the former. A propos morality, I believe that the Palestinian Arabs and their leaders had a moral obligation to oppose Zionist resettlement of Jewish refugees, whose purpose was not to live in peace in a Palestian state, but to conquer the land for the Jews. Statist Zionism has succeeded for one very obvious reason: the Zionists were strong and the Palestinians were weak. That's a "tale as old as time..." To see religious significance in the founding of the state of Israel, in the way that religious Zionists do, is blasphemous. My God doesn't destroy an innocent people to make way for me. And you know what -- neither does the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, or even Joshua.
2. The particular state of Israel founded in 1948, and whose ethos continues to the present day, is thus, in my mind, without moral justification. A necessary condition for its moral justification is regime change, i. e., the replacement of an ethnic-exclusivist state by a binational or bicultural state of all its citizens. Necessary, but not sufficient -- the Zionists, and, indeed, Israel and its supporters, have a collective responsibility to better the lives, liberty, freedom, and self-determination of the Palestinians -- a responsibility that will continue for decades into the future.
3. I can hope for such things, but they won't occur in my lifetime, at least. So what interests me now is how can people try to remain moral, or more moral, living in a political framework that is inherently immoral. What should they do? The easiest and most consistent answer is simply to move somewhere else. But that answer is unavailable to me for several reasons. First, as an economically well-off white male, I will enjoy privilege wherever I go. Second, and more to the point, my children and their families live in Israel. Third, Israel is my home. So staying in Israel, like staying in any inherently immoral regime where the prospects of significant change are remote, has challenges that people who care about these things need to face.
4. The best I can do -- and it is nowhere good enough -- is to donate time and money to causes that will make Israel/Palestine a more just society, to speak up and explain my position to others who support the Jewish state, to help alleviate specific suffering and inequality,to support individuals and groups who promote change, etc.
5. None of the above relieves me of my feeling of perpetrator guilt. For me, the single most pressing challenge to Jews and Judaism today is the treatment of the Palestinians, past, present, and future, and I know of only a handful of people who would agree with me. What Jewish thinker is writing about it? We read about Jewish spirituality (especially in Israel) on the right, of tikun olam/social justice on the left, etc., but what deeply Jewish personality is at all bothered about this? And don't get me started on the rabbis....
6. So what gives me hope? Several things: first, sumud, Palestinian endurance, the refusal, indeed, inability, of the Palestinians to give up, get over it, and move on. Second, the passing of time, and the passing of the hackneyed Zionist narrative, and, indeed, the weakening of support for a Jewish ethnic state among thinking individuals who take liberty and equality seriously. Third, the aging and passing of my generation, the boomer generation , which was innoculated against common-sense morality by Zionist indoctrination, and ignorance of a Palestinian counter-narrative more consistent with the facts.
7. I recently attended the opening evening of the J Street Convention, and the loudest cheers among the young people were for folks like Bernie Sanders, Ayman Odeh, and for notions of Israel-Palestinian civil equality and partnership. These are young Jews who may not wish to join the BDS movement, but see nothing wrong with it as a movement of Palestinian resistance. Yes, some of them consider themselves Zionist, but they are willing to trade-in traditional Zionism for a weaker version, i.e., an Israel that fosters Jewish national and cultural aspirations but not at the expense of Palestinian national and cultural aspirations. Let's hope that they bend the arc of justice more than my generation has.
8. To call anti-Zionism or criticism of the Israeli regime "anti-Semitic" is not only false, but is also a hateful and hurtful slur, which should be condemned as such. It often masks deep bigotry and ethnic prejudice. Wishing to see all Israelis dead is not anti-Semitic although it is an expression of anti-Israel bigotry, which, like all bigotry, should be condemned.
Well Jerry, I for one am delighted to see you back here. We need your voice.
Thank you, Friend, for this post. I've always valued your perspective.
The Empty Path
Thank you so much for returning to the blogging world. I have been a supporter of Jews For Justice For Palestinians from my previous life in Manchester UK. Your blog has always been an inspiration. The message has to be repeated. One never knows who is listening to our collective message for peace and justice in Palestine. My journey from early religious Zionism to a more humanitarian, tolerant and equitable position has been helped along through my accessing words written by inspirational individuals; of which I count you as one of those people.I welcome your continued perspectives in helping me keep the momentum towards a just peace and helping me in my continued approaches towards my colleagues and associates.
For a just peace in Palestine for all it's peoples.
If the title of this post implies that you're still asking that question, my answer is a resounding Yes. The low frequency of the posts didn't make any difference to me − I always wanted to read what you were saying, and usually found it very valuable. To repeat the obvious: the charge of antisemitism against the Palestinian solidarity movement has turned out to be a ridiculously effective tactic, and one of the best ways to counter it is to raise a voice of opposition from inside the Jewish community.
Your reasons for stopping don't work: I'm sure you do have new things to say in response to a changing situation; the bleakness is discouraging, but we should view it as a reason for continuing not giving up; as the world gets worse, it needs voices for justice even more; no, it's not about you, but that doesn't mean that no-one cares what you think. Write on!
Please continue this blog. We need you voice
Please continue this blog. We need your voice!
I enjoy your blog. I'm a newcomer who started working on a research project on Magnes' correspondence with Ralph Bunche about a year ago. a friend sent me your blog and I enjoyed going through the past posts. Happy to see you writing again!
Dear Mr. Haber,
You wrote two things that make no sense in my opinion.
1. "Zionism, as a movement to create a Jewish nation state, in the way it was created, cannot be morally justified. No people has a right to life, liberty, and self-determination at the expense of another people's right to life, liberty, and self-determination, especially when the latter people constituted the majority of the territory claimed by the former."
Sorry, but it makes no sense. All minorities exercise their right to self-determination at the expense of a majority. Moreover, if the right to national self-determination is universal, Jews should benefit from it as well (just like the Palestinians by the way). There is enough room on the face of the Earth for all peoples. There is no reason why some peoples can monopolize all the land while others remain homeless.
That said, the Palestinians' opposition to Zionism was totally understandable. Why should they be the ones paying for the creation of Israel? After all, they are not responsible for the misfortunes of the Jews.
This is precisely why Amos Oz (and Sari Nusseibeh) refer to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as a struggle between right and right, instead of a simplistic Western movie scenario that you seem to subscribe to.
2. "The particular state of Israel founded in 1948, and whose ethos continues to the present day, is thus, in my mind, without moral justification. A necessary condition for its moral justification is regime change, i. e., the replacement of an ethnic-exclusivist state by a binational or bicultural state of all its citizens."
Virtually all states were born in sin. No one claims that the Arabs should be stripped of their right to self-determination because they have colonized the Middle East and North Africa. No one argues that the Spaniards should be stripped of their right to self-determination because of the Reconquista that led to the ethnic cleansing of the Muslim and the Jews. And of course, no one says that Turkey has no right to exist because of the dispossession of the Greeks, the Kurds, and the Armenians (the word "dispossession" is clearly an understatement when it comes to the Armenians). Radical anti-Zionists might not be anti-Semitic per se, but wanting to dismantle Israel and no other state is really creepy.
All the best,
PS - You only blame Israel for the absence of peace, but in 2014, the Palestinians have rejected the Kerry/Obama peace plan. It's the third peace plan they reject that would have allowed them to recover almost all the West Bank (they rejected the Clinton parameters in 2001, and Olmert's offer in 2008 as well). If they really wanted a state of their own, they could have had it a long time ago.
I find your blog useful. It encourages me, tells me that I'm not the only person who thinks that "universal values" might trump Jewish solidarity.
I'm over 70, but my outlook matches fairly well to your younger "J-Street Jews" in point 7. I suppose that my early Zionist indoctrination didn't "take".
So if you keep writing, I'll keep reading.
. Charles Cohen
Post a Comment